Skip to content

Add comprehensive test coverage for SettingsForm component#12

Open
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
devin/1757976473-add-settingsform-tests
Open

Add comprehensive test coverage for SettingsForm component#12
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
devin/1757976473-add-settingsform-tests

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link

Add comprehensive test coverage for SettingsForm component

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive test coverage for the SettingsForm component that was previously missing from the test suite. The implementation includes:

  • TestSettingsForm class (17 tests): Covers form validation, password handling, model integration, and edge cases
  • TestSettingsViewIntegration class (4 tests): Tests integration with the settings view and HTMX functionality

The tests follow existing patterns in the codebase using TestCase with setUpTestData() and cover all specified requirements including:

  • Form validation tests (email formats, required fields, field length constraints)
  • Password handling (hashing when provided, preservation when empty, whitespace handling)
  • Model integration (data persistence, unique constraints, instance updates)
  • Edge cases (commit=False, field ordering, form initialization)
  • View integration (GET/POST requests, HTMX error responses)

All 34 tests in the accounts app now pass, confirming no regressions were introduced.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

  • Verify form validation behavior: Test the actual settings form in the app to ensure the test assertions match real form behavior, especially for email validation and field constraints
  • Test password handling security: Manually verify that password updates work correctly and that empty passwords preserve existing ones (critical security behavior)
  • Run full test suite: Confirm all tests pass consistently and no flaky behavior exists in the new tests

Notes

The initial test implementation had some failing tests that required adjustment to match Django's actual behavior rather than assumed behavior (URLField validation, whitespace password handling, HttpResponseClientRedirect status codes). This suggests the test assertions needed refinement to accurately reflect the real form behavior.

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/f8f88bd987024cf08a65708bdd8ea7cb
Requested by: Jude Partovi (@jpartovi)

- Add TestSettingsForm class with 17 form validation tests
- Add TestSettingsViewIntegration class for view integration tests
- Test password handling, model integration, and edge cases
- Follow existing test patterns with setUpTestData() method
- Ensure comprehensive coverage of all form functionality
- All tests pass successfully with no regressions

Co-Authored-By: Jude Partovi <jude@partovi.org>
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants